University of Technology Sydney

94709 Future Value and Impact

Warning: The information on this page is indicative. The subject outline for a particular session, location and mode of offering is the authoritative source of all information about the subject for that offering. Required texts, recommended texts and references in particular are likely to change. Students will be provided with a subject outline once they enrol in the subject.

Subject handbook information prior to 2024 is available in the Archives.

UTS: Creative Intelligence and Innovation: TD School
Credit points: 3 cp
Result type: Grade, no marks

Requisite(s): 94700 Creative Intelligence and Strategic Innovation Masterclass
These requisites may not apply to students in certain courses.
There are course requisites for this subject. See access conditions.

Description

A range of futuring methods are introduced from across industries and disciplinary domains. Participants experiment with these methods to explore different futures thinking approaches and investigate future value and impact. In doing so, participants consider economic, environmental, social, and cultural value.

Subject learning objectives (SLOs)

Course intended learning outcomes (CILOs)

This subject contributes specifically to the development of the following course intended learning outcomes:

  • Create productive strategies for contributing to thriving and sustainable innovation networks and ecosystems (1.3)
  • Apply theoretical and philosophical perspectives to critically analyse assumptions and the ways disciplines, paradigms and practices guide thinking in academic, professional and everyday contexts (2.1)

Teaching and learning strategies

This Key Enabling Methodology (KEM) subject is offered online and supported by face-to-face sessions. Participants explore emerging cutting-edge approaches and methodologies for investigating and creatively responding to complex real-world challenges. Participants also draw on their experiences in professional fields and organisational contexts to reflect on ways that these new approaches could enable them to innovate in practice. By doing so, participants develop a repertoire of approaches that can be strategically applied in their professional contexts. Through reflective tasks participants develop their creative intelligence – including professional judgement about how these approaches can generate innovation in real-world contexts.

Assessment

Assessment task 1: Work in Progress

Intent:

This task asks you to provide a draft of your final output, in order to generate feedback from teaching staff and peers. You’ll need to provide sufficient detail to communicate key aspects of the project: selecting a situation, selecting methods, applying methods, and reflecting on the process.

Objective(s):
This assessment task contributes to the development of course intended learning outcome(s):

1.3 and 2.1

Type: Report
Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 20%
Length:

Not strictly specified

Criteria:
  • Sufficient volume of information provided to enable peer and teaching staff feedback (60%)
  • Rigour in selecting appropriate strategic situation and methods (40%)

Assessment task 2: Peer Coaching

Intent:

Engage with and provide constructive feedback on work in progress produced by your peers in the subject, connecting your feedback to the overall assessment objectives.

Objective(s):
This assessment task contributes to the development of course intended learning outcome(s):

1.3 and 2.1

Type: Exercises
Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 10%
Criteria:
  • Number of peer feedback comments provided – minimum 2 (70%)
  • Quality of comments provided (30%)

Assessment task 3: Presentation

Intent:

This task asks you to present your assessment project in our final live session for the subject.

Objective(s):
This assessment task contributes to the development of course intended learning outcome(s):

1.3 and 2.1

Type: Presentation
Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 10%
Criteria:
  • Presentation covers key aspects of the project including situation, methods, insights, and reflection (80%)
  • Clarity of communication (20%)

Assessment task 4: Final Output

Intent:

This task asks you to produce a final version of your project case study, showcasing/articulating your application of methods from this subject to your chosen situation AND reflection on the process as described in detail in Canvas.

Objective(s):
This assessment task contributes to the development of course intended learning outcome(s):

1.3 and 2.1

Type: Case study
Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 60%
Criteria:
  • Degree of critical analysis in selection of situation and methods (50%)
  • Rigour in applying frameworks / theory to generate insights (30%)
  • Level of creative synthesis and clarity of communication (20%)

Minimum requirements

To pass this subject students must make a reasonable attempt to meet the expectations outlined in the brief of each assessment task, and achieve an overall pass grade for the subject.

Required texts

See Canvas and reading list for overview of texts and resources for this subject