University of Technology Sydney

78150 Law and Mental Health

Warning: The information on this page is indicative. The subject outline for a particular session, location and mode of offering is the authoritative source of all information about the subject for that offering. Required texts, recommended texts and references in particular are likely to change. Students will be provided with a subject outline once they enrol in the subject.

Subject handbook information prior to 2025 is available in the Archives.

UTS: Law
Credit points: 6 cp
Result type: Grade and marks

Requisite(s): ((22 credit points of completed study in spk(s): C07122 Graduate Diploma Legal Studies OR 22 credit points of completed study in spk(s): C04264 Master of Legal Studies)) OR (70107c Principles of Company Law AND (94 credit points of completed study in spk(s): C04236 Juris Doctor OR 142 credit points of completed study in spk(s): C04250 Juris Doctor Master of Business Administration OR 94 credit points of completed study in spk(s): C04363 Juris Doctor Master of Intellectual Property OR 94 credit points of completed study in spk(s): C04364 Juris Doctor Graduate Certificate Trade Mark Law and Practice) AND 70106c Principles of Public International Law) OR (94 credit points of completed study in spk(s): C04320 Juris Doctor Graduate Certificate Professional Legal Practice AND 70106 Principles of Public International Law)
The lower case 'c' after the subject code indicates that the subject is a corequisite. See definitions for details.
These requisites may not apply to students in certain courses. See access conditions.
Anti-requisite(s): 76038 Law and Mental Health AND 78149 Law and Mental Health

Description

This subject provides students with an introduction to law and mental health. Students explore legal frameworks for coercive mental health interventions encountered by people with psychosocial and cognitive disability and critically reflect on these in the context of broader consideration of law’s role in enabling and responding to violence and inequality. The application of current legal doctrine and practices are examined as well as alternatives offered by international human rights norms and domestic law reform proposals. The subject takes an interdisciplinary approach to analysing and evaluating law, which centres narratives and perspectives of the disability community and also draws on legal doctrine, law reform reports, international human rights commentary, empirical research and critical scholarship. Students learn directly from members of the disability community, including through guest lectures. Taking an intersectional approach, the subject interrogates the relationships between law, mental health, ableism, settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy. As a result of successfully completing this subject, students have a deepened appreciation for the importance in law and policy work of directly engaging with the disability community. They also have increased skills in advocating for and working alongside people with psychosocial and cognitive disability, identifying systemic legal issues relating to coercive mental health interventions and evaluating the efficacy of different analytical perspectives and legal reform options in relation to contemporary debates about law and mental health.

Subject learning objectives (SLOs)

Upon successful completion of this subject students should be able to:

1. Critically engage with a range of primary and secondary sources in relation to law and mental health, including narratives and perspectives of the disability community;
2. Explain and critically reflect upon contemporary legal approaches to mental health, particularly in relation to coercive mental health interventions;
3. Critically assess and evaluate law’s role in enabling and responding to violence and inequality, in relation to people with psychosocial and cognitive disability;
4. Evaluate contemporary debates on domestic law reform and international human rights developments in relation to law and mental health;
5. Formulate well-researched and persuasive law reform proposals related to contentious issues in law and mental health.

Course intended learning outcomes (CILOs)

This subject also contributes specifically to the development of the following graduate attributes which reflect the course intended learning outcomes:

  • Critical Analysis and Evaluation
    A capacity to think critically, strategically and creatively, including an ability to:
    a. Identify and articulate complex legal issues in context, including the skill of critical reading and writing;
    b. Apply reasoning and research to generate appropriate theoretical and practical responses; and
    c. Demonstrate sophisticated cognitive and creative skills in approaching complex legal issues and generating appropriate responses. (3.1)
  • Communication
    Well-developed professional and appropriate communication skills including:
    a. Highly effective use of the English language to convey legal ideas and views to different and diverse audiences and environments;
    b. An ability to inform, analyse, report and persuade;
    c. An ability to strategically select an appropriate medium and message;
    d. A cognisance of advanced communication technologies and willingness to adopt where appropriate; and
    e. An ability to respond respectfully. (5.1)
  • Collaboration
    Advanced and integrated collaboration skills in working together to achieve a common goal in a group learning environment or the workplace including:
    a. An ability to give and receive feedback;
    b. Appropriate professional and interpersonal skills in working collaboratively; and
    c. A capacity to develop strategies to successfully negotiate group challenges. (6.1)

Teaching and learning strategies

Strategy 1: Learning through people and place

Drawing on place-based and experiential pedagogies, students learn directly from and through the lived experiences of the disability community through guest lectures and subject materials. Some of the guest lectures will focus specifically on development of professional skills in communication, representation and advocacy. Through this strategy, students gain new insights into law and mental health which they can draw on in understanding current legal frameworks and in developing evidence-based arguments for redress, law reform and socio-legal transformation. They also develop skills to enhance their capacity to work with the disability community. Moreover, students have opportunities to challenge and transform their understandings of the role of law and lawyers in achieving social justice for people with psychosocial and cognitive disability through unseating the privileged position of academic and professional expertise on law and mental health, and inviting re-evaluation of lawyers’ ethical and professional roles and responsibilities in relation to the disability community.
Strategy 2: Collaborative and interactive learning

Each week, students engage in collaborate group discussion in online and face-to-face classroom settings. Through this engagement, students evaluate primary and secondary sources on current legal frameworks, develop new perspectives on law and mental health, and share ideas, thoughts and concerns about redress, law reform and socio-legal transformation. In this way, students engage in deeper consideration of legal, social, political and ethical issues relevant to law and mental health, and to explore these in the context of their future professional roles as lawyers and policymakers. Participating actively in informed and meaningful discussion hones individual understanding and development of analytical skills. Students have the opportunity to seek immediate feedback from the seminar leader and peers, particularly to clarify contentious issues in the subject. Students work collaboratively during classes on legal problem scenario, law reform scenario, and critical discussion seminar activities.

Strategy 3: Early and consistent feedback

The collaborative learning approach utilised will enable ongoing feedback to be provided as class discussions unfold and areas of learning need are identified. The use of guest lectures and legal problem scenario and law reform scenario activities provide opportunities for feedback on skills. In-class discussion of research essays provides an opportunity for self-assessment.

Subject Delivery: 12 x 3 hour face-to-face seminar classes.

Content (topics)

  • Introduction to disability: lived experiences, First Nations approaches, and different cultural approaches
  • Critical approaches to disability, law and justice
  • Disability international human rights and Disability Justice
  • Settler colonial relations, law and mental health
  • Representing clients with psychosocial and cognitive disability
  • Civil mental health law
  • Criminal justice and forensic mental health law
  • Guardianship and financial management law
  • Legal regulation of sexuality and reproduction
  • Legal responses to violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation
  • Ways forward: redress, reform, transform?

Assessment

Assessment task 1: Seminar Participation

Objective(s):

This task addresses the following subject learning objectives:

2, 3 and 4

This task contributes specifically to the development of the following graduate attributes:

3.1, 5.1 and 6.1

Weight: 20%
Length:

1000 words equivalent

Criteria:
  • Consistent, relevant and informed contributions to class discussion;
  • Evidence of preparation for class and development of understanding of materials;
  • Capacity to communicate ideas to peers;
  • Evidence of thorough engagement with course readings;
  • Critically reflective engagement with topics, demonstrates willingness to consider and engage with alternative viewpoints and, where relevant, to admit to lack of understanding or areas of confusion;
  • Reflective, responsive and respectful attitudes towards other perspectives expressed by peers;
  • Taking initiative in generating discussion, encouraging others to participate and raising pertinent questions, that contributes to a collaborative learning environment.

Assessment task 2: Reflective Statement

Objective(s):

This task addresses the following subject learning objectives:

1, 2 and 3

This task contributes specifically to the development of the following graduate attributes:

3.1, 5.1 and 6.1

Weight: 30%
Length:

1000 words (excluding references in footnotes and bibliography) - no extra 10% words leeway.

Criteria:
  • Critical reflection: Expresses nuanced understanding of how learning in this subject has been informed by selected learning experience, including through identification of and engagement with relevant Law Graduate Attributes targeted in the learning experience (GA: 3.0, SLO: 1)
  • Critical analysis: Contextualises reflections on how learning has been informed by selected learning experience through: succinct introductory overview of the selected learning experience, identification of relevant legal topic/s explored in ‘Law and Mental Health’ subject, and discussion of law’s role in enabling and responding to violence and inequality (GA: 3.0, SLO: 1, 2, 3)
  • Written communication: Clearly describes reflection and understanding through logical, succinct and persuasive written presentation (GA: 5.0; SLO: 2, 3)

Assessment task 3: Research Essay

Objective(s):

This task addresses the following subject learning objectives:

1, 2, 3 and 4

This task contributes specifically to the development of the following graduate attributes:

3.1, 5.1 and 6.1

Weight: 50%
Length:

1950 words (excluding references in footnotes and bibliography) - no extra 10% words leeway.

Criteria:
  • Knowledge: Demonstrates doctrinal and critical understanding of relationships between law and mental health (GA: 3.0; SLO: 2, 3, 4)
  • Critical analysis: Critically assesses and evaluates existing law including in the context of relevant developments in domestic law reform and international human rights (GA: 3.0; SLO: 2, 3)
  • Persuasive writing: Demonstrates advanced critical thinking and analytical skills by developing a clear argument, applying critical approaches and lived experience narratives and perspectives to support development of argument and sustaining and concluding that argument (GA: 3.0, 5.0; SLO: 3, 4, 5)
  • Legal research: Conducts effective legal research, identifying appropriate primary and secondary legal sources as well as interdisciplinary sources (noting the jurisdictional, temporal and geographical foci of the question), and accurately and consistently uses AGLC referencing (including accurate and complete acknowledgement of sources) (GA: 3.0, SLO: 1)
  • Written communication: Writes clearly, articulates essay argument and essay structure in introduction, and structures the essay in a logical and effective way in order to advance the argument in response to the question (GA: 5.0, SLO: 1, 5)

Required texts

Please refer to Canvas site.

Recommended texts

Please refer to Canvas site.

References

Please refer to Canvas site.

Other resources

Please refer to Canvas site.