University of Technology Sydney

17903 Planning and Design Theory and Decision Making

Warning: The information on this page is indicative. The subject outline for a particular session, location and mode of offering is the authoritative source of all information about the subject for that offering. Required texts, recommended texts and references in particular are likely to change. Students will be provided with a subject outline once they enrol in the subject.

Subject handbook information prior to 2024 is available in the Archives.

UTS: Design, Architecture and Building: School of the Built Environment
Credit points: 6 cp
Result type: Grade and marks

There are course requisites for this subject. See access conditions.

Description

This subject studies and analyses contemporary planning and urban design theory and advanced planning and design practices. It allows students to observe, perform and reflect on advanced techniques in the broad themes of ecologically sustainable development and design, place-making, community participation and economic development. Lectures and discussions explore the application of planning theory and contemporary planning approaches to: urban economic development; collaborative planning and design, including efforts to empower people from minority cultures such as Indigenous Australians; and planning and design as part of the overall urban management for environmentally and culturally sustainable development, as well as the operation of institutional frameworks. This subject encourages students to critically think about the role of planning and design, and their own role as practitioners in shaping the built environment and influencing decision making processes.

Subject learning objectives (SLOs)

On successful completion of this subject, students should be able to:

1. Develop effective communication strategies
2. Develop a reflexive critical understanding of one’s own perspective
3. Interpret and evaluate the ethical dilemmas that planners and urban designers face
4. Identify the theoretical approaches to inequality and inclusiveness, and be able to apply this to professional practice
5. Explain the historical development of theories and practice of urban planning and design
6. Present solid evidence in support of an evaluation and application of theory and practice

Course intended learning outcomes (CILOs)

This subject also contributes to the following Course Intended Learning Outcomes:

  • Enable reflective practice on one's personal views and values and interpret how they might affect one's professional judgement (A.1)
  • Demonstrate ethical responsibilities of professional planners and urban designers and develop critical ethical thinking capability (A.2)
  • Evaluate the history of disadvantage and inequality in societies (in an Australian context this would apply in particular to Indigenous Peoples. In addition to people disadvantaged by gender, disability, social class or ethnicity for example) and formulate a reasoned argument for how planners and urban designers should address significant social inequalities (A.3)
  • Work effectively in teams of people with diverse professional and personal backgrounds (C.1)
  • Communicate with people with a wide variety of cultural, social, economic, and political perspectives and interests using verbal, written, and visual media (C.2)
  • Articulate how and why the roles of planning and urban design have evolved in response to new social, cultural, economic, and political forces (P.2)
  • Develop coherent and logically structured arguments that use evidence appropriately (R.5)

Contribution to the development of graduate attributes

The term CAPRI is used for the five Design, Architecture and Building faculty graduate attribute categories where:

C = communication and groupwork

A = attitudes and values

P = practical and professional

R = research and critique

I = innovation and creativity.

Course intended learning outcomes (CILOs) are linked to these categories using codes (e.g. C-1, A-3, P-4, etc.).

Teaching and learning strategies

This subject is taught fully online. Each week is self-paced through the learning management system. You are expected to complete a range of different learning activities throughout the week. Activities provide opportunities to learn, apply and discuss the knowledge gained in a practical manner. Feedback is provided from both peers and teaching staff throughout the activities. You are encouraged to actively provide feedback and interact with staff and students in the exercises and on the discussion board(s). Online Zoom sessions will be held regularly throughout the subject to allow you to interact with staff and students, ask questions and receive clarification and formative feedback on your assignments.

Content (topics)

1. History of the city, urban planning and urban design

2. Rational planning

3. Democratic planning

4. Theory in practice

5. Engaging with Indigenous communities

6. Urban challenges and theory

Assessment

Assessment task 1: City history video

Intent:

Based on the insights gained in weeks 1, students are asked to evaluate the evolution of a selected city and how the different periods have influenced its current state and form.

Objective(s):

This task addresses the following subject learning objectives:

1 and 5

This task also addresses the following course intended learning outcomes that are linked with a code to indicate one of the five CAPRI graduate attribute categories (e.g. C.1, A.3, P.4, etc.):

C.2 and P.2

Type: Case study
Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 15%
Length:

Maximum of 5 minutes (ideal 3 minutes)

Criteria linkages:
Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs
Professional quality of video 40 1 C.2
Clarity and depth of assessment of the historical development of the city 60 5 P.2
SLOs: subject learning objectives
CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Assessment task 2: Rational and democratic planning strategy and reflection

Intent:

Based on the insights gained during weeks 2, 3 and 4, students are asked to critically examine a stakeholder engagement strategy of a real-life case study and develop specific recommendations for the assigned case study.

In doing this, the students are required to critically reflect on the implications of each approach in the planning process when applied to a real-world scenario.

Objective(s):

This task addresses the following subject learning objectives:

1, 2, 4 and 6

This task also addresses the following course intended learning outcomes that are linked with a code to indicate one of the five CAPRI graduate attribute categories (e.g. C.1, A.3, P.4, etc.):

A.3, C.1, C.2 and R.5

Type: Report
Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 45%
Length:

2000 words (+/- 10%)

Criteria linkages:
Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs
Professional quality of written presentation 15 1 C.2
Clarity and depth of understanding of stakeholders, their interests, and their input in the project 25 4 A.3
Effective use of case study, readings and other evidence to support arguments 15 6 R.5
Appropriateness of techniques and strategies recommended to achieve objectives and engage stakeholders as proposed 25 4 A.3
Clarity and relevance of initial case study assessment and final reflection 20 2 C.1
Academic English Language Level (Does not count toward final grade) If you receive a Level 1 or Level 2 please refer to assessment instructions for further information. 0
SLOs: subject learning objectives
CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Assessment task 3: Planning and Design Theory and Decision-Making Essay

Intent:

Students are asked to develop a critical essay on the relationship between planning theory and practices, and the future impact they may have on each other.

Objective(s):

This task addresses the following subject learning objectives:

1, 2, 3 and 6

This task also addresses the following course intended learning outcomes that are linked with a code to indicate one of the five CAPRI graduate attribute categories (e.g. C.1, A.3, P.4, etc.):

A.1, A.2, C.2 and R.5

Type: Essay
Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 40%
Length:

1500 words (+/- 10%)

Criteria linkages:
Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs
Coherence and clarity of argument 20 1 C.2
Whether the essay answers / addresses the questions posed 30 3 A.2
Use of relevant planning theory and decision-making readings to support argument 30 6 R.5
Appropriateness of personal insight, and examples or evidence used to support argument 20 2 A.1
SLOs: subject learning objectives
CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Minimum requirements

Students must achieve at least 50% of the subject’s total mark.

Required texts

All required texts are indicated on Canvas.