University of Technology Sydney

11371 Writing Matters

Warning: The information on this page is indicative. The subject outline for a particular session, location and mode of offering is the authoritative source of all information about the subject for that offering. Required texts, recommended texts and references in particular are likely to change. Students will be provided with a subject outline once they enrol in the subject.

Subject handbook information prior to 2025 is available in the Archives.

UTS: Design, Architecture and Building: Architecture
Credit points: 6 cp
Result type: Grade and marks

Requisite(s): 144 credit points of completed study in spk(s): C10413 Bachelor of Design Architecture Master of Architecture
These requisites may not apply to students in certain courses.
There are course requisites for this subject. See access conditions.

Description

While architects, landscape architects and interior architects primarily rely on graphics to communicate ideas, writing is an essential aspect of practice, scholarship and creative ideation. In practice, designers use writing to win projects, awards, competitions and client confidence. As students, clear and coherent writing helps to explain, and justify, design approaches and illustrate critical thought. Writing, and it's clear verbal articulation, is not only an integral communication tool, it is a generative and creative practice. Good designers are good writers.

This elective is intended for the spatial design disciplines to learn to become better writers, and accordingly, better designers. The subject explores structure and syntax, creativity and experimentation, persuasion and scholarship, rhetoric and relevance through reading, writing exercises and experimentation. Presented in a workshop format, it is developed to suit individual ways of thinking, drawing, designing and critically reflecting.

Subject learning objectives (SLOs)

On successful completion of this subject, students should be able to:

1. Write with evidence to support a position and an argument.
2. Write fluently and coherently about spatial design.
3. Write critically, illustrating an understanding of research methods.

Course intended learning outcomes (CILOs)

This subject also contributes to the following Course Intended Learning Outcomes:

  • Advocate for landscape values to specialist and non-specialist audiences. (A.2)
  • Present critical arguments about how research informs and drives design practice. (C.1)
  • Innovate using emergent forms of landscape architectural practice, methods and technologies. (I.1)
  • Critically position work within an extended disciplinary context. (R.1)
  • Independently formulate and test complex ideas, arguments and rationales through designs. (R.2)
  • Challenge design conventions through scholarly research and investigative practice. (R.3)

Contribution to the development of graduate attributes

The term CAPRI is used for the five Design, Architecture and Building faculty graduate attribute categories where:

C = communication and groupwork

A = attitudes and values

P = practical and professional

R = research and critique

I = innovation and creativity.

Course intended learning outcomes (CILOs) are linked to these categories using codes (e.g. C-1, A-3, P-4, etc.).

Teaching and learning strategies

In this subject, students will develop a written exegesis using the designs that they are developing in studio to become clearer at explaining what they are doing, what influenced them, how they did it and why it will be important.

Weekly work will include

- Discussions on good writing, good academic writing and good architectural writing

- Review of article-length written work by others

- Weekly development of students’ skills in writing

Content (topics)

  • Writing clearly
  • Writing for different audiences
  • Writing forms and conventions
  • Writing research
  • Writing literature reviews
  • Writing about designs and designing
  • Writing critically
  • Writing creatively
  • Verbal communication
  • Making structure, grammar, syntax and punctuation work effectively

Assessment

Assessment task 1: Writing Workshops

Intent:

To develop writing skills for spatial design practices.

Objective(s):

This task addresses the following subject learning objectives:

1, 2 and 3

This task also addresses the following course intended learning outcomes that are linked with a code to indicate one of the five CAPRI graduate attribute categories (e.g. C.1, A.3, P.4, etc.):

C.1, I.1, R.2 and R.3

Type: Exercises
Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 40%
Criteria linkages:
Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs
Develop a clear and coherent writerly voice, conveying key concepts and intent 30 2 C.1
Draw critically upon existing sources, ideas, and research 20 1 R.3
Engage creatively with language in its written and spoken forms 30 3 I.1
Weekly contribuitions 20 1 R.2
SLOs: subject learning objectives
CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Assessment task 2: Design Exegesis

Intent:

To communicate critically about design via an essay and verbal presentation

Objective(s):

This task addresses the following subject learning objectives:

1, 2 and 3

This task also addresses the following course intended learning outcomes that are linked with a code to indicate one of the five CAPRI graduate attribute categories (e.g. C.1, A.3, P.4, etc.):

A.2, C.1 and R.1

Type: Essay
Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 60%
Criteria linkages:
Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs
Employ a clear and coherent voice to effectively convey meaning 30 2 A.2
Substantiate arguments in a scholarly manner using appropriate evidence 25 1 R.1
Choose structure and language that serves a line of argumentation 25 3 C.1
Communicate verbally in a manner that is engaging and confident 20 2 A.2
SLOs: subject learning objectives
CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Minimum requirements

The DAB attendance policy requires students to attend no less than 80% of formal teaching sessions (lectures and tutorials) for each class they are enrolled in to remain eligible for assessment.