University of Technology Sydney

11194 Landscape Architecture Studio 8

Warning: The information on this page is indicative. The subject outline for a particular session, location and mode of offering is the authoritative source of all information about the subject for that offering. Required texts, recommended texts and references in particular are likely to change. Students will be provided with a subject outline once they enrol in the subject.

Subject handbook information prior to 2024 is available in the Archives.

UTS: Design, Architecture and Building: Architecture
Credit points: 12 cp
Result type: Grade and marks

Requisite(s): 11191 Landscape Architecture Studio 7 AND 132 credit points of completed study in spk(s): STM91202 168cp Core subjects (Landscape UG) BLArch(Hons)
There are course requisites for this subject. See access conditions.

Description

This is the final design subject in the Bachelor of Landscape Architecture (Honours) ( C09079). In this subject, students undertake a research-intensive design studio project, demonstrating advanced ability to autonomously create critical and reflective research outputs at a professional level and well-developed judgement, adaptability and responsibility as a practitioner or learner. This student-led final design studio project is resolved and documented as a series of research outcomes and findings through presentation and exhibitions. The emphasis is on the student's independent scholarly advancement and the development of advanced theoretical and technical knowledge in the core disciplinary learning areas of Environment, History and Theory, Technology and Construction, Communication and Collaboration.

Subject learning objectives (SLOs)

On successful completion of this subject, students should be able to:

1. Analyse critically, evaluate and integrate complex information in order to locate a site and disciplinary issue
2. Frame a problem, articulate a position and generate a proposition
3. Rigorously test the proposition against an established set of design criteria
4. Develop the idea to a resolved scale using advanced critical thinking, technical and communication skills
5. Communicate a design argument, using innovative and sophisticated visual, oral and written skills

Course intended learning outcomes (CILOs)

This subject also contributes to the following Course Intended Learning Outcomes:

  • Apply an informed, ethical position towards social, technical and environmental issues and practices. (A.1)
  • Communicate ideas professionally. (C.2)
  • Create designs that respond to their context in formally or conceptually innovative ways. (I.1)
  • Advance ideas through an exploratory and iterative design process. (I.2)
  • Develop advanced skills for the production, presentation and documentation of work. (P.1)
  • Generate solutions to complex problems through an exploratory and iterative design process. (P.2)

Contribution to the development of graduate attributes

The term CAPRI is used for the five Design, Architecture and Building faculty graduate attribute categories where:

C = communication and groupwork

A = attitudes and values

P = practical and professional

R = research and critique

I = innovation and creativity.

Course intended learning outcomes (CILOs) are linked to these categories using codes (e.g. C-1, A-3, P-4, etc.).

Teaching and learning strategies

Teaching and Learning Strategies:

Teaching and learning strategies for this subject include, but are not limited to:

  1. Your own independent design research and enquiry within a framework developed in close consultation with instructors
  2. Discussion-based one-on-one sessions with instructors
  3. Small workshop tutorials with instructors or guest instructors
  4. Classroom sessions including visual, oral and written presentations occurring during scheduled class times
  5. Exhibitions presented as visual, oral and written work to internal and external critics for formal or informal assessment.

Feedback:

The subject provides a range of formative feedback strategies.

  1. All assessments are graded in REVIEW. REVIEW will be used to provide formal grading and assessment for all assessment tasks, in addition to oral feedback during class sessions, reviews and crits.
  2. The subject is designed around progressive development and assessment items. Twice-weekly sessions will progressively assist you with the skills to develop and complete this project and provide you with ongoing formative feedback throughout the subject. It is therefore vital you attend all classes and complete the work (both assessed and otherwise) as outlined in the Subject Outline and Briefs.

Modes of Learning:

The subject will be delivered in a range of modes including but not limited to: lectures, supervised research, self-guided autonomous research, self-governed on-site investigations, literature reviews, case studies, research through design, drawing and visual communication strategies, iterative design development, discussion, project reflection, exhibitions, presenting to an audience, panel based feedback and peer-to-peer based feedback.

Content (topics)

Topics covered throughout this course include:

  • Establishment of disciplinary frameworks for research-led design in landscape architecture
  • Identification and use of research resources, relevant literature and precedents
  • Methodologies for research-led design processes
  • Defining issues of site, program, context
  • Advanced means of representation and communication
  • Technical ‘resolution’ (to an appropriate level of detail)
  • The development of research-led, speculative and/or experimental design propositions communicated through diagrams, drawings, models, oral presentations, videos, slides, etc.

Assessment

Assessment task 1: A: Positioning

Intent:

Evaluate the quality of the students design proposal

Objective(s):

This task addresses the following subject learning objectives:

1, 2 and 5

This task also addresses the following course intended learning outcomes that are linked with a code to indicate one of the five CAPRI graduate attribute categories (e.g. C.1, A.3, P.4, etc.):

A.1, P.1 and P.2

Type: Design/drawing/plan/sketch
Groupwork: Group, group assessed
Weight: 15%
Criteria linkages:
Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs
Analyse critically, evaluate and integrate complex information in order to locate a site and disciplinary issue 40 1 A.1
Synthesise advanced theoretical and technical knowledge with an understanding of site to frame a problem, articulate a position and generate a proposition 30 2 P.2
Communicate a design argument, using innovative and sophisticated visual, oral and written skills 30 5 P.1
SLOs: subject learning objectives
CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Assessment task 2: B: Developing

Intent:

Evaluate the quality of the students design proposal

Objective(s):

This task addresses the following subject learning objectives:

3, 4 and 5

This task also addresses the following course intended learning outcomes that are linked with a code to indicate one of the five CAPRI graduate attribute categories (e.g. C.1, A.3, P.4, etc.):

C.2, I.2 and P.2

Type: Design/drawing/plan/sketch
Groupwork: Group, group assessed
Weight: 20%
Criteria linkages:
Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs
Rigorously test the proposition against an established set of design criteria 35 3 I.2
Develop the idea to a resolved scale using advanced critical thinking, technical and communication skills 35 4 P.2
Communicate a design argument, using innovative and sophisticated visual, oral and written 30 5 C.2
SLOs: subject learning objectives
CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Assessment task 3: C: Resolving

Intent:

Evaluate the quality of the students design proposal

Objective(s):

This task addresses the following subject learning objectives:

2, 3, 4 and 5

This task also addresses the following course intended learning outcomes that are linked with a code to indicate one of the five CAPRI graduate attribute categories (e.g. C.1, A.3, P.4, etc.):

C.2, I.1, I.2 and P.2

Type: Design/drawing/plan/sketch
Groupwork: Group, individually assessed
Weight: 65%
Criteria linkages:
Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs
Synthesise advanced theoretical and technical knowledge with an understanding of site to frame a problem, articulate a position and generate a proposition 25 2 I.1
Rigorously test the proposition against an established set of design criteria 25 4 I.2
Develop the idea to a resolved scale using advanced critical thinking, technical and communication skills 25 3 P.2
Communicate a design argument, using innovative and sophisticated visual, oral and written skills 25 5 C.2
SLOs: subject learning objectives
CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Minimum requirements

The DAB attendance policy requires students to attend no less than 80% of formal teaching sessions (lectures and tutorials) for each class they are enrolled in to remain eligible for assessment.