University of Technology Sydney

020213 Maths Methods for In-Service Teachers (Year 7-12)

Warning: The information on this page is indicative. The subject outline for a particular session, location and mode of offering is the authoritative source of all information about the subject for that offering. Required texts, recommended texts and references in particular are likely to change. Students will be provided with a subject outline once they enrol in the subject.

Subject handbook information prior to 2024 is available in the Archives.

UTS: Education: Initial Teacher Education
Credit points: 6 cp
Result type: Grade and marks

Requisite(s): 68106 Mathematics for Secondary Education Calculus 1 AND 68103 Mathematics for Secondary Education Statistics
These requisites may not apply to students in certain courses.
There are course requisites for this subject. See access conditions.

Description

This subject explores how mathematics teaching and curriculum can be organised and managed for effective learning. It shows how theory can inform teaching practice to provide in-service teachers with the skills and understanding required to teach mathematics in a secondary school. The subject includes a study of secondary mathematics syllabuses, lesson planning, approaches to learning, and resources for student engagement. It highlights a range of mathematics teaching strategies and different forms and functions of practical work, with a focus on development of content knowledge that is essential for teaching mathematics for understanding.

Subject learning objectives (SLOs)

a. Analyse mathematics syllabus documents to identify the concepts and skills that secondary school learners need to develop
b. Explain mathematical ideas accurately and with clarity including use of suitable language, examples and models
c. Analyse mathematics teaching strategies, drawing on theories of mathematics teaching and learning
d. Identify and evaluate a range of resources to enhance the teaching of mathematics and engage students in their learning.
e. Plan, present and manage mathematics lessons
f. Enhance secondary school mathematics learning with teaching methods and resources that build upon Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ways of teaching and learning
g. Evaluate and reflect on mathematics teaching and its effectiveness.

Course intended learning outcomes (CILOs)

This subject engages with the following Course Intended Learning Outcomes (CILOs), which are tailored to the Graduate Attributes set for all graduates of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.

  • Analyse: Demonstrate critical engagement with mathematical knowledge in the secondary classroom context. (1.1)
  • Analyse: Critically evaluate information in the investigation of mathematical and pedagogical problems. (2.1)
  • Evaluate: Appraise research in mathematics and mathematics education. (2.3)
  • Analyse: Derive innovative solutions to complex mathematical and educational problems. (4.1)
  • Synthesise: Through reflection, own and understand their learning journey. (4.2)
  • Evaluate: Critique approaches to meeting educational needs. (4.3)
  • Synthesise: Develop and Communicate complex ideas. (5.2)
  • Evaluate: Integrate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledges into professional practice and evaluate its impact. (6.3)

Contribution to the development of graduate attributes

The subject contributes specifically to the development of the following Course Intended Learning Outcomes:

  • Analyse: Demonstrate critical engagement with mathematical knowledge in the secondary classroom context. (1.1)
  • Analyse: Critically evaluate information in the investigation of mathematical and pedagogical problems. (2.1)
  • Evaluate: Appraise research in mathematics and mathematics education. (2.3)
  • Analyse: Derive innovative solutions to complex mathematical and educational problems. (4.1)
  • Synthesise: Through reflection, own and understand their learning journey. (4.2)
  • Analyse: Critique approaches to meeting educational needs. (4.3)
  • Synthesise: Develop and communicate complex ideas. (5.2)
  • Evaluate: Integrate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledges into professional practice and evaluate its impact. (6.3)

Graduate Attribute 1. Disciplinary knowledge

Teacher-education students will engage with mathematics from the perspective of a teacher, learning to field school-student queries and diagnose mathematical misconceptions.

Graduate Attribute 2. Research, inquiry and critical thinking

Teacher-education students are encouraged to consider different models for implementing mathematics teaching and learning activities, to develop an understanding of the relative advantages offered by various teaching strategies and resources, and a sense for situations where different teaching strategies would be beneficial.

Graduate Attribute 3. Professional, ethical and social responsibility

Teacher-education students are required to reflect on the role of the mathematics teacher in the school, particularly regarding equality of educational opportunity for all school-students.

Graduate Attribute 4. Reflection, Innovation and Creativity

Teacher-education students will be given opportunities to experiment with different teaching methods and required to reflect on the effectiveness of their execution, with an aim of developing metacognitive skills to inform their future practice.

Graduate Attribute 5. Communication

Teacher-education students will develop skills required to communicate mathematical ideas clearly and confidently, using varied modes, to support secondary school-students with different learning styles.

Graduate Attribute 6. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Knowledges and Connection

Teacher-education students will learn about Indigenous Australian ways of sharing knowledge and how these methods can be applied for teaching secondary school mathematics.

Teaching and learning strategies

This subject is designed for block mode delivery supported by online asynchronous study. Teacher-education students are to attend two on-campus sessions. Asynchronous learning is offered on the Learning Management System Canvas. Teacher-education students are actively involved in the asynchronous sections of this subject by contributing to online interactive elements on Canvas, where they comment on the contributions of other students.

Content (topics)

Mathematics Methods for In-Service Teachers is a practical subject that draws upon mathematics education research to address the day-to-day considerations of secondary school mathematics teaching and learning. In-service teachers explore teaching strategies that suit different learning styles, and develop an awareness of qualities of mathematics teaching that support students’ sense making, mathematical communication, problem solving, and reasoning. They develop lessons that implement ideas from mathematics education research, and identify and utilise teaching resources, including ICT, for engaging school-students in their learning.

Assessment

Assessment task 1: Teaching a Homework Question

Intent:

This assessment task contributes to the development of the following graduate attributes:

1. Disciplinary knowledge.

2. Research, inquiry and critical thinking

3. Professional, ethical and social responsibility

4. Reflection, innovation, creativity

5. Communication

Objective(s):

b, e and g

Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 40%
Length:

1. Responses to 80 questions with multiple choice or numerical responses (automatic grading).

2. Full worked solutions for ten homework questions, equivalent to 50 words per question (500 words)

3. One (individual) presentation, maximum 10 minutes (equivalent to 400 words)

4. One self-evaluation, maximum 250 words.

Criteria linkages:
Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs
a. Homework questions: Correctness of mathematics, and clarity, accuracy and cohesiveness of written communication, including the use of suitable calculations, diagrams, and other modes of expression as appropriate. 50 b 1.1
b. Teaching: Appropriateness of strategies to promote relational understanding of mathematical concepts. 20 e 5.2
c. Teaching: Strength of justification of strategies to engage learners. 20 e 4.1
d. Self-evaluation: Depth of reflection on the presentation. 10 g 4.2
SLOs: subject learning objectives
CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Assessment task 2: Lesson Plan and Lesson Play

Intent:

This assessment task contributes to the development of the following graduate attributes:

1. Disciplinary knowledge.

2. Research, inquiry and critical thinking

3. Professional, ethical and social responsibility

4. Reflection, innovation and creativity

5. Communication

6. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Knowledges and Connection

Objective(s):

a, b, c, d and f

Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 30%
Length:
  1. One lesson plan based on template, equivalent to 500 words.
  2. One report, equivalent to 500 words.
  3. One “lesson play” based on prompt, equivalent to 500 words.
Criteria linkages:
Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs
a. Correctness and appropriateness of references to NSW 7-12 mathematics syllabus documents. 5 a 1.1
b. Depth of analysis and interpretation of the teaching strategies, with APA referencing for scholarly literature that is used to justify pedagogical choices. 20 c 2.3
c. Strength of justification of strategies to engage learners, including appropriate and judicious use of teaching resources and ICT. 20 d 4.1
d. Depth of understanding regarding the application of Aboriginal perspectives to mathematics teaching. 10 f 6.3
e. Appropriateness of strategies to promote relational understanding of mathematical concepts. 25 b 2.1
f. Clarity, accuracy, conciseness and cohesiveness of lesson plan, and appropriateness and reasonableness of language in “lesson play”. 30 b 5.2
SLOs: subject learning objectives
CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Assessment task 3: Maths Pedagogy

Intent:

This assessment task contributes to the development of the following graduate attributes:

1. Disciplinary knowledge.

2. Research, inquiry and critical thinking

3. Professional, ethical and social responsibility

5. Communication

Objective(s):

b and c

Groupwork: Individual
Weight: 30%
Length:

Solutions for mathematics questions, and brief summaries of teaching methods, equivalent to 50 words per question (500 words).

Criteria linkages:
Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs
a. Clarity of explanation of mathematical concepts, substance and structure of the content, and teaching strategies. 50 b 1.1
b. Depth of knowledge of how students learn and the implications for teaching. 50 c 4.3
SLOs: subject learning objectives
CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Required texts

NSW Education Standards Authority (n.d.). Mathematics K-10 syllabus. https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-10/learning-areas/mathematics/mathematics-k-10

NSW Education Standards Authority (n.d.). Mathematics Stage 6. https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/11-12/stage-6-learning-areas/stage-6-mathematics

NSW Education Standards Authority (n.d.). Mathematics syllabuses. https://curriculum.nsw.edu.au/learning-areas/mathematics

References

Barnes, M. (1991). Investigating change Vol. 1, pp. 17-21. Curriculum Corporation.

Clarke, D., Roche, A., Cheeseman, J., and Sullivan, P. (2014). Encouraging students to persist when working on challenging tasks. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 70(1), pp. 3-11.

Dossel, S. (2016). Maths anxiety. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 72(3), pp. 40-44.

Dweck, C.S., Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), pp. 256-273.

Fitzallen, N. (2015). When does 1/2 = 1/3? Australian Mathematics Teacher, 71(1), 36-40.

Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2012). Numeracy across the curriculum. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 68(1), pp. 3-7.

Gray, E.M., and Tall, D.O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: A "proceptual" view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), pp. 116-140.

Horne, M. (2005). Algebra revisited. In M. Coupland, J. Anderson, & T. Spencer (Eds.), Making mathematics vital: Proceedings of the Twentieth Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, pp. 308-315. AAMT Inc.

Kazemi, E., Hintz, A. (2014). Intentional talk: How to structure and lead productive mathematical discussions. Stenhouse.

Moloney, K., & Stacey, K. (1996). Understanding decimals. The Australian Mathematics Teacher, 52(1), pp. 4-8.

Movshovits-Hadar, N. (1988). School mathematics theorems - An endless source of surprise. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(3), pp. 34-40.

Murray, M. (2003). Supporting mathematics learning through English language teaching strategies. Reflections, 28(1), pp. 35-40.

Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, pp. 20-26.

Thurston, W. (1990). Mathematical education. Notices of the AMS, 37(7), pp. 844-850.

Vincent, J., Bardini, C., Pierce, R, Pearn, C. (2016). Misuse of the equals sign: An entrenched practice from early primary years to tertiary mathematics. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 29(2), pp. 31-39.

Zazkis, R., Sinclair, N., Liljedahl, P. (2013). Lesson play in mathematics education: A tool for research and professional development. Springer.

Other resources

Maths equipment in Education store room (Building 10 Level 4).